Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

In light of the federal government’s two-year civilian pay freeze, agencies have begun to fear the loss of key talent within their organizations.

A November 2010 report from the Partnership for Public Service revealed that the federal attrition rate is down, with nearly a quarter of government hires from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2008 leaving their jobs within two years.

The report also cited the need for improved hiring and onboarding strategies, as well as additional training and advancement opportunities within the federal workplace. High attrition rates have been proven to leave federal employees demoralized, and can cost agencies anywhere from 50 percent to 200 percent of an employee’s salary to fill a single position.

While pay raises to reward outstanding remaining employees are not allowed for the next several years, bonuses are still permissible, and promotions are also viable options.

PPS’ study asserts that career development, meaningful feedback and work-life programs are great ways to retain top talent in lieu of pay raises.

Has your agency’s attrition rate already dipped following the “no pay raise” rule? Is management doing anything to address the issue or keep it from happening at all? What strategies are—or could—work for retaining top federal talent?

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

On January 7, the House introduced a bill which proposes to freeze federal pay for a third year, in addition to cutting the federal employee workforce by 10 percent.

Congress and President Obama passed a bill last month to freeze federal employees’ pay for two years, through 2011 and 2012. However, the bill proposed by Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, would extend the pay freeze to one more year, including the year 2013.

The bill also entails annual cuts of $300 million from the federal vehicle fleet, $400 million from federal travel, and $440 million from non-defense printing budgets.

According to Rep. Brady, the CUTS Act would be a balancing factor for the budget and will help in reducing federal expenditures by around $153 billion.

Do you think the pay cut for federal employees is a good idea? Is three years too excessive? What alternate plan would you suggest to help alleviate the government’s budget woes?

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

The rapidly growing pay of federal workers has caught the attention of the fiscally conservative Republicans, who won the majority of last week’s elections for the U.S. House of Representatives.

A study performed by USA Today has found that the average federal salary has risen significantly over the last several years. The number of federal employees earning $150,000 and more has doubled, and salaries have increased tenfold since Obama moved into the Oval Office.

The USA Today analysis also revealed that the raises were prevalent government-wide, but thatlong-time workers have benefited most from pay increases. The salaries of federal employees working since 2005 have climbed 25 percent, in comparison to a nine percent inflation rate for short-term workers. Physicians within the federal workforce have also been rewarded. Medical professionals at veteran prisons and hospitals now earn an average of $179,500, as compared to $111,000 in 2005.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, heads the panel which will analyze federal pay. Chaffetz says he wants a pay freeze and a 10 percent pay cut across the federal workforce.

“It’s stunning when you see what’s happened to federal compensation,” says Chaffetz. “Every metric show we’re heading in the wrong direction.”

Do you agree with Chaffetz? How is it that some people feel government workers are grossly overpaid, while other studies reveal them to be underpaid for their performance?

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

In February 2010, the White House proposed a General Schedule pay raise of 1.4 percent for federal civilian employees, effective in 2011. However, in April 2010, the Senate voted to freeze the pay for the members of Congress. They unanimously voted against the $1,600 pay raise that Congress members were scheduled to get the next year.

The federal pay freeze proposal was defeated on June 18 when the Senate rejected it due to the size of the workforce. The chamber also dismissed an amendment by Senator John Thune (R-SD) which was aimed at paying for a tax and jobs bill by dropping federal bonuses and the 2011 pay raise.

Senator Thune defended his proposed amendment, stating, “The alternative amendment I proposed was a common sense step toward restoring fiscal sanity to our nation’s runaway spending and ballooning deficit.” He further added that “the defeat of my amendment was a missed opportunity for Congress to prove they are serious about tackling our dangerous spending habits and $13 trillion national debt. This amendment would have lowered taxes for families and small businesses as they struggle through these challenging times.”

Senator Ted Kaufman (D-Del), argued that the Republicans were using incorrect information regarding federal pay and bonuses; he stated, “Over the years, as I’ve witnessed countless acts of personal courage, devotion to country and real sacrifice” by federal employees, but “I have also seen and heard such disheartening and baseless attacks against those who choose to serve. The pending amendment is just the latest assault”.

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink